Sunday, January 31, 2010

MY SHOES- #15

Originally priced at $60.00, I bought these shoes at Ross for $15.99. These shoes are not me. I feel like a traitor to myself wearing them. I can't exactly put my finger on why I feel that way. They're made by Perry Ellis which is definitely kind of sassy, and there is something vaguely feminine about their design, which made me question if they had been placed in the men's section accidentally. Yet I kind of like them. Sarah says, "they look good," and when it comes to style I trust her judgment more than my own. These may be the strangest shoes to ever make it into my lineup. I'm not sure yet what their niche will be on the team. They did get the start today over the Ducks and the overworked Champlain Boat Shoes, but I anticipate that the Boat Shoes will continue to carry the bulk of the workload going into the future. I don't know...what do you think?



I am enjoying being reunited with velcro footwear. Why hasn't velcro entirely replaced shoe laces? It's superior, isn't it?

Saturday, January 30, 2010

FRICTION RIDGES

Several years ago I watched Jim Chilcutt explain why he believes Sasquatch exists. Before watching I was a skeptic, and afterwards I was a believer.

PHOTO FROM BUMMER-FREE ZONE INSPIRES PAINTING ON EXHIBIT IN AZ

Arizona artist and devoted follower of the Bummer-Free Zone, Tricia Irving, has a water color on exhibit at the Edna Vihel Center which was inspired by the above photo which originally appeared right here on the Bummer-Free Zone as part of a montage of photos from our family vacation back to Lake Champlain and VT last October.
Thanks for the heads up, Tricia. I'm honored to have played a small role in this. It's a beautiful painting.

OVERHEARD IN TOWN

"You aint got enough boom-boom for those jeans!"
Forty-something lady to her teenager daughter- Ross Clothing Store- Hemet, CA

"If you like coke better than pepsi why are you drinking fruit punch?"
Father to his daughter- Rubio's- Hemet, CA

WHAT'S SO NEFARIOUS ABOUT LOBBYISTS ANYWAY?

I watch a lot of news, and for years they have been beating the lobbyist drum pretty hard. I know bribing and buying votes is wrong, but I don't think lobbying is (at least as I understand it, which may be criminally naive.). It seems to me like there is a real substantive difference between crooks like Abramoff and most of the lobbyists out there, but all of the pundits and politicians I've heard talk as though they're all the same. They talk endlessly of lobbyists and special interests as though they're all a bunch of sleeze-balls handing out bags of cash so politicians will look the other way on stuff. I know all about Abramoff, and yadda-yadda-yadda, but most of the lobbying seems pretty above board to me, and even important. It seems to me that efforts by special interest groups such as corporations, and industries to influence legislators shouldn't be curtailed so long as their behavior isn't illegal. Why is it bad for groups to scrap and fight for their perspective? It sounds messy, but not unethical. Am I wrong?

MY SHOES- #14

This past Thursday I discovered ROSS. It's like a flea market where everything is brand new. I'm a huge Ross fan now. Okay, I will admit that their selection is kind of limited, but you can't beat their prices. I needed to add some depth to my shoe lineup so we swung by Ross to see what they had.
They're weird, I know, but they were only $9.99, and they fit, and they're not that weird anyway. I call them "the ducks" because their colors kind of remind me of a mallard.
Don't be jealous.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

QUESTION OF THE DAY

Most of you have already separated into camps over the dog or cat issue, and I am not going to ask if you are a dog person or a cat person. That would be too facile. I want you to try and step back from your biases and, as objectively as possible, answer this question- which animal provides the most benefit, in terms of services rendered, to their respective owners? Which is the most useful pet today?

A ROCK?

Since childhood I have been familiar with the Genesis 28 story of Jacob's dream where he sees angels ascending and descending the ladder to heaven, and everytime I run into that account I always have the same question- Why was he using a rock as a pillow? That sounds really uncomfortable...worse than using nothing at all. Couldn't he have wadded up a tunic or something? I think even scraping a little pile of dirt together would have been better then resting his noggin on the unforgiving surface of a rock. Does that part of the story strike anyone else as strange? My friend, John Cornish, who is a new Christian, found the story interesting and intends to recreate it out in the desert near his home in Palm Springs. I'll let you know if he liked sleeping with a rock for a pillow when he gets back to me.

Monday, January 25, 2010

WELCOME TO THE NEW HOME OF THE BUMMER-FREE ZONE!!!

GOOD AND PLENTY IS A FAT FREE CANDY!!!

Do you know what else is fat free?

Methamphetamines.

SLEDDING IN THE SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS




Ahhhh!!!!







Bowden and his friend, Joel.

Go Jack!!! Hold on, little man.




This was the last run of the day for any of the Tate kids. I took Jack all the way up to the top (the highest he'd ever attempted) and released him, but the sun was setting, it was getting colder, and the hard-packed sled run had frozen hard as asphalt with a surface texture akin to sandpaper. So when Jack wiped out at the bottom there was blood and a hasty retreat back home. This last photo was taken just moments before disaster.

LA JOIE DE VIVRE

There are few sensations as satisfying as a productive Q-Tip swab.